Conflict Diamond (Blood Diamond) |

Diamonds are used to fund armed conflicts


Government controls are poorly enforced
In October 2006, a report of a UN Group of Experts on Cote d’Ivoire concluded that conflict diamonds from Cote D’Ivoire were infiltrating the legitimate diamond trade through Ghana. In many countries that have joined the Kimberley Process, government controls in the diamond trade are still inadequate and poorly enforced "See AI Analysis and Recommendations on Kimberley Process". As the brutal conflict in Sierra Leone has shown, even a small amount of conflict diamonds can wreak enormous havoc in a country. Adding to that …
Industry’s commitments are not followed through
In 2004, Amnesty activists in the UK and USA surveyed 579 diamond retailers to find out what they were doing to combat the trade in conflict diamonds. They found that 56% were unable to produce a hard copy of their policy and only 13% could provide warranties that their diamonds are conflicts free. The majority of the retailers are still not aware of conflict diamonds, not making relevant sourcing policies, not training their staff on the issue, and not able to provide warranties to customers"See Survey on Diamond Retailers". The Kimberley Process, the controls and monitoring by governments and the industry are still waiting to be strengthened.
"Resources for Actions"
"Newspaper article"